Happy Birthday Rochford Street Review!

On the 2nd December 2011 the first three reviews/articles were uploaded to the brand new Rochford Street Review site. The articles were:

I had a vague idea of what I wanted RSR to be. I wanted, for example, a site that would pick up small press publications and try to place them in some sort of context. There seemed to be a rise in the number of chapbooks being produced for example and, for the most part they were being ignored by the major reviewing outlets (the Saturday papers, ABR etc). The mainstream literary journals had limited capacity to run reviews and it seemed that a lot of good stuff might be slipping through the gaps. A new on-line journal seemed to be the way to go so I began looking for the easiest (and cheapest) way of setting it up. After checking out a number of blog sites and templates I settled on WordPress for some reason – so far it seems to have worked OK.

At the time I was aiming to publish a review a week if possible. After a year there have been 87 posts of which 73 have been reviews, articles or launch speeches (the others have been admin posts – desperate appeals for money, desperate appeals for reviewers or table of contents for special events). We have had 19,800 hits up until 8pm on 2 December 2012 (which means we have averaged just over 50 a day!).

As the site has evolved over the last year one of the more pleasing features has been the number of people who have been willing to either write for RSR or offer us a launch speech or an article they haven’t yet been able to place. The diversity of the people who have contributed, from young and/or new reviewers to more established writers and critics, has been particularly pleasing – more so when you realise we are not in the position to pay people for their work.

There are, of course, a number of things I wanted to do over the past year but haven’t as yet. One of the highlights was the special Dransfield piece in April which attracted almost 200 hits on a single day. I had wanted to do something similar on Vicki Viidikas and Jennifer Rankin but haven’t been able to organise it. I also wanted to do a series of interviews – I did one with Johanna Featherstone from Red Room on their ‘Disappearing’ project but am only half way through transcribing it.

As we begin our second year I have thrown together the following stats:

OVERALL POSTS

Number of posts 87
Number of Reviews 73
Number of Admin posts 14

GENDER BREAKDOWN BY AUTHOR (author of book being reviewed)

     
issue 1 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Author  
     
  Male 6
  Female 0
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    6
     
     
     
Issue 2 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Author  
     
  Male 5
  Female 2
  mixed (eg joint) 2
     
    9
     
     
     
Issue 3 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Author  
     
  Male 8
  Female 5
  mixed (eg joint) 7
     
    20
     
     
Issue 4 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Author  
     
  Male 6
  Female 4
  mixed (eg joint) 5
     
    15
     
     
Issue 5 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Author  
     
  Male 8
  Female 5
  mixed (eg joint) 4
   
    17
     
Issue 6 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Author  
     
  Male 3
  Female 2
  mixed (eg joint) 2
   
    7
Total Male 35
  Female 18
  mixed (eg joint) 20
     
    73

GENDER BREAKDOWN BY REVIEWER

issue 1 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 5
  Female 0
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    5
     
     
     
Issue 2 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 7
  Female 1
  mixed (eg joint) 1
     
    9
     
     
Issue 3 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 15
  Female 3
  mixed (eg joint) 2
     
    20
     
     
     
Issue 4 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 7
  Female 8
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    15
     
     
Issue 5 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 9
  Female 8
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    17
     
     
     
Issue 6 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 3
  Female 4
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    7
Total Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 46
  Female 24
  mixed (eg joint) 3

GENDER BREAKDOWN BY REVIEW (Excluding Mark Roberts – editor)

issue 1 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 1
  Female 0
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    1
     
     
     
Issue 2 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 5
  Female 1
  mixed (eg joint) 1
     
    7
     
     
Issue 3 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 7
  Female 3
  mixed (eg joint) 2
     
    12
     
     
     
Issue 4 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 4
  Female 8
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    12
     
     
Issue 5 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 5
  Female 8
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    13
     
     
     
Issue 6 Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 2
  Female 4
  mixed (eg joint) 0
     
    6
Total Reviews Gender Breakdown by Reviewer  
     
  Male 24
  Female 24
  mixed (eg joint) 3

Why Dransfield…Why now?

One of the things I want to do with Rochford Street Review is to make sure writers receive the recognition I feel they deserve. I can think of a number of writers straight away which I think should be front and centre….creative writers who we should all know about, writers who should be cast in bronze, like footballers and cricketers around the gardens of the SCG or MCG…..Poets such as Vicki Viidikas, Kerry Leaves, Jennifer Rankin, Charles Buckmaster and many others.

In choosing to highlight Dransfield in this first feature I am accurately aware of the comment Laurie Duggan made in foam:e Issue 8 when he commented on Louise Waller’s review of Vicki Viidikas’ New and Rediscovered:

“I’ve read Louise’s review of Vicki Viidikas. It’s right on the money. A whole book could be written about why a male poet like Michael Dransfield (who died of drug use) could be continuously lauded and republished while a woman like VV was largely forgotten If you don’t want a whole book, then one word might do: Romanticism.”

But despite Duggan’s comment I don’t believe Dransfield’s reputation is as secure as he suggests. My understanding is that only the Kinsella edited Selected Poems is still in print and much has been made of Dransfield’s exclusion from the Lehmann/Gray anthology.

For me Dransfield remains an illusive figure. He wrote some wonderfully lyric poems, some other poems (particular some that were published after his death) were not so good. All the time, however, there is the image of the ‘poet’. the romanticism (real or created) which has threatened to swamp his poems.

And I want to get to those other poets, Viidikas, Leaves, Buckmaster and, in particular Rankin who, I believe is one of the most under-rated Australian poets of the last 40 years.

When I started thinking about pulling this piece on Dransfield together I asked various people for their views on Dransfield. There were some interesting replies, many of which were pasted on various pages on Facebook.

.

Chris Mansell remembered: “First reading I ever went to was: David Campbell, Martin Johnston, and Michael Dransfield. What a reading. I still remember it v vividly. Bought his book later but was too shy to ask for him to sign it”.

.

Richard James Allen wrote: “I wish I had met him. His iconoclastic spirit seemed to haunt the corridors of his old school, Sydney Grammar, which I also attended, in liberating way – a nice antidote to the more traditional Banjo Paterson, also an alumni. I always recall, “a moving target is harder to hit”: http://www.poetrylibrary.edu.au/poets/dransfield-michael/ground-zero-0712045

.

Richard Tipping recalls: “Michael and I were the youngsters in an anthology Twelve Poets in 1971, when I was 21 and living in Adelaide. Michael was a year older. We never met, though I lived in Sydney for two years (1969 and 1973) and we had friends in common. One of my favourite Dransfield poems is which I sometimes recite by heart – begins: “in the forest / in unexplored valleys of the sky / are chapels of pure vision” and includes ‎”i dream of the lucidity of the vacuum / orders of saints consisting of parts of a rainbow / identities of wild things / of what the stars are saying to each other up there / above idols and wars and caring … ” Apologies for ragged quoting. Just to say that Michael words remain an important part of the experience of Australian poetry.

.

Juno Gemes recalls “My Aunt was Chief Librarian at Sydney Grammar for 40 years…apparently the library has strong holdings in Michael Dransfield’s papers…”

.

Christopher Barnett writes “michael was a great lyric poet with a connection to the lyricism of js neilson, christopher brennan, james tulip & a parallel connection with robert (adamson). it does not surprise me that minor poets have tried to aggrandize their own reputations by excluding him & the little we have from charles buckmaster. what defined them was their generosity & a very real connection to people poetry had ignored”.

.

Rosemary Nissen-Wade “I’ve been introducing Australian poets to an international online audience unfamiliar with them. All have been well received; Dransfield was the one whose poetry most overwhelmed them. They thought his writing beautiful, brilliant, and extraordinary. So do I.”

Philip Rees - This is a painting i did in Febuary-March last year ..it is inspired by the poem Bums' rush..its called ''out...to where the ice is thinnest'',acrylics,textas,pencils,house paint,dirt on wood, 1.2mtrsx 1.2 mtrs,
For me Dransfield poems have always since i first read him in the early 1970's invoked images in my mind's eye.

Issue 2: January – February 2012 Contents.

Rochford Street Press